Category: Arizona Casino & Sports Betting News

One of the more well-known NFL & nbsp games in the 2021 season was supposed to be played on Sunday and ESPN.

Some people, mostly from Wisconsin and Missouri, may speculate that it might serve as a teaser of Super Bowl LVI.

The Kansas City Chiefs and Green Bay Packers will host the game in Week 9, which was scheduled to have two of the NFL’s top players. emphasis on the & ldquo, as intended. & rdquo,

Aaron Rodgers, the franchise quarterback and NBA point guard, will certainly play this week due to a good COVID – 19 diagnosis. Naturally, oddsmakers have significantly shifted the Chiefs & rsquo’s favor.

However, when placing a wager on this sport in Arizona, not everything is lost. In fact, FanDuel Sportsbook has added an additional incentive to make a bet, & nbsp.

Win$ 150 on a$ 5 moneyline wager with FanDuel Arizona thanks to improved odds.

This weekend, any FanDuel Arizona user who makes their first deposits and places a wager on the moneyline of Packers-Chiefs will receive boosted odds of 30/1.

That & rsquo is correct. Just select the game’s success to receive a larger payout.

A & nbsp wagers are the maximum allowed for bettors. But if your wager turns out to be successful, that one Abe Lincoln could earn$ 150 andnbsp.

Arizonans may take advantage of this present between now and right before commencement on Sunday. Within 72 hours, all winning wagers will be fulfilled & nbsp.

Consider the value in this offer. As it stands, FanDuel — as well as most betting apps in Arizona — lists Kansas City as a favorite, essentially saying that the Chiefs will win by at least a touchdown and extra point. As a result, the Packers go in as underdogs.

Without the boost, That & rsquo, s. A$ 5 wager on that Chiefs parlays() may yield a payout of roughly$ 1.50. You can shift that decimal point two places to the right with the increase in chances.

Who do you have with FanDuel Arizona possibilities increase?

With no Aaron Rodgers, the Packers must turn to the quarterback who (reportedly) caused such epic consternation because Green Bay drafted him in the first round of the 2020 draft: Jordan Love.

Additionally, the Packers ( 7-1 ) don & rsquo don’t appear to have much of a chance against Kansas City without Rodgers, at least in the eyes of oddsmakers. It makes sense: The Chiefs( 4-4 ) have struggled this season with the franchise & rsquo, suffering their worst losses in nine weeks and nbsp since 2015. A week ago, Green Bay faced the Arizona Cardinals and dealt with some COVID-related roll problems. ( Although, with future Hall of Famer Aaron Rodgers leading the way, the Pack did upset Arizona. )

Green Bay does not possess the special play-making talent that its star quarterback possesses without Rodgers. What & rsquo, additionally, a Virtually inexperienced QB squares off against a Kansas City defense that & rsquo, hoping to let loose eight weeks of repressed annoyance.

However, the Packers’ victory over Arizona on Thursday evening football surprised several next week. Additionally, the Chiefs don’t exactly have the best work threats. Additionally, Kansas City has turned the ball over a league-high 19 times, including Patrick Mahomes, 10 interceptions, and high & nbsp. Mahomes was struck 12 days in 2018 during his first full season as a start. He has a combined 11 interception in the two years since then.

The NFL period has seen some crazy things happen. Choose your area. FanDuel is ready.

sports betting, professional sports, live music, and drink. Sounds to me like a group.

Indeed, this Saturday, FanDuel FanFest & nbsp invades WestWorld in Scottsdale.

FanDuel Sportsbook has an event to bring Arizona & nbsp residents together just weeks after successfully launching in the Grand Canyon State with both an online sportsbook and a retail operation at Footprint Center.

While legal Arizona online sports betting has taken the Grand Canyon State by storm, FanDuel now looks to keep the momentum going by bringing Arizonans a fun experience that seems especially ideal for sports fans.

What to anticipate at the Arizona FanDuel FanFest

Through this great celebration with the fans, FanDuel hopes to give back and enjoy. Grammy Award-winning hip-hop icon Nelly and musician / DJ Gryffin will give exclusive performances at the event.

A Q & amp, A session and meet-and-gree with Hall of Fame running back Edgerrin James and former Arizona Cardinals wide receiver Anquan Boldin will also be available to fans throughout the day.

Free-to-play pick-and-rsquo, em games with celebrities and fans competing in live challenges will also be available during interactive sessions with Phoenix Suns and even & nbsp players.

Additionally, fans can anticipate sporting carnival games, food cars, a beer courtyard, and more.

The FanDuel and Lionsgate filmmaking business collaborated on the FanFest function. The event will commemorate the upcoming release of Lionsgate & rsquo’s movie & ldquo, American Underdog, and / or, which will be released on Christmas Day.

The film is based on the life of Kurt Warner, an NFL player who went from working as a supermarket stockboy to becoming well-known. Warner later won the Super Bowl and was named a two-time NFL MVP in addition to being inducted into the Pro Football Hall of Fame.

Arizonans are familiar with Warner from his five-year Cardinals career. During the 2008 season, he was in charge of Arizona’s second and sole Super Bowl look. However, the Pittsburgh Steelers defeated the Cardinals in an instant classic to win Super Bowl XLIII. Warner performed admirably, but Arizona was defeated in the game’s final hours thanks to a remarkable touchdown pass from Ben Roethlisberger to Santonio Holmes.

In the movie & rsquo, actor Zachary Levi & nbsp portrays Warner in the lead role. He and Warner will both attend FanFest and participate in a live Q & amp session with fans. Additionally, they may engage in a quarterback concern for charity.

Additionally, FanFest offers a reward offer from FanDuel Sportsbook Arizona.

FanDuel FanFest is free for both new and existing FanDuel customers. If you already have a FanDuel Sportsbook AZ account, there is a link that will allow you to claim two free tickets.

If you lack You still have time to register if you don’t already own a FanDuel profile and want to attend FanFest. FanDuel will increase your initial bet extra to$ 1,000 once your account has been activated. You will receive two free tickets to the event once you place any wager of at least$ 20.

At the occasion, foods, soft drinks, and drinking will be available for purchase. To enroll, you must be 21 or older. There won’t be any tickets sold at the celebration.

Put Arizona to the list of states where FanDuel Sportsbook is available.

The Grand Canyon State became the tenth authority to offer FanDuel’s sports wagering and daily fantasy sports app as the weekend got underway.

FanDuel is unable to accept wagers prior to September 9; however, people may begin opening and funding their accounts. Additionally, dream activities are active in Arizona.

New FanDuel users can also take advantage of an earlier sign-up present to start their play as an added benefit.

Information about the FanDuel first sign-up provide

FanDuel Arizona has a special Saturday.

Not only can the operator start marketing its AZ betting app to customers, but it can also start offering and accepting entries for daily fantasy sports in Arizona.

Fresh users of FanDuel can open accounts in both categories. They can do this by taking advantage of the$ 100 sign-up offer & nbsp, which serves as bonus bet credits when wagering goes live on September 9 and free paid entries for DFS. The$ 100 bonus will be divided into two payments by FanDuel:$ 75 for sports betting and$ 25 for fantasy sports.

On the DFS go-live time, which is today in Arizona, users will be able to use the credit. The offer may be fulfilled within a day for those who register between now and September 9.

starting out with FanDuel in Arizona

It doesn’t take much time or effort to sign up with FanDuel, which is available for & nbsp, iOS + nnpspp, and & ndbpp.

FanDuel only needs a few pieces of data from brand-new people. This enables the operator to confirm the customers’ years and personalities.

People may be required to supply:

• full title in law
• birthdate
• Social Security number’s final four figures
• a home address
• Email target

Customers can start funding their mobile accounts after completing the sign-up process and agreeing to FanDuel & rsquo’s terms and conditions. Additionally, their prize will soon arrive.

Customers can use the$ 25 DFS credit as soon as it is available, but they cannot use it until legal gambling begins on September 9.

Check for other offers and get the FanDuel promo code for Arizona.

We have just speculated as to where the retail operation may be located since FanDuel Sportsbook partnered with the Phoenix Suns in April at Footprint Center, the residence of the NBA andnbsp company.

Then, a more distinct picture is visible.

FanDuel released renderings for its physical casino, showing a sizable installation at the venue that is home to the Suns, Phoenix Mercury, WNBA, Arizona Rattlers and nbbsp, as well as the Indoor Football League.

Information about Suns & rsquo and FanDuel Sportsbook

FanDuel became one of the first legal sports betting operators to gain market access to Arizona, as the company aligned with the Suns the same day Gov. Doug Ducey signed off on legislation to legalize regulated wagering.

FanDuel is the first to announce its financial sporting betting strategies in the state four months later.

The betting will be situated on the & nbsp, an outdoor bench, and will cover more than 7,400 square feet. According to a release, it will also function as an & ldquo, fans & rsquo one-stop shop to watch Suns games and other sporting events around the world while placing bets on the action.

The daily-open retail location will have a number of services, including:

• There are five bets panels.
• a single VIP glass
• 40 HD screens
• 35-foot film wall
• MVP Space
• 26 self-service bookmakers

When did AZ start offering sports betting?

FanDuel undoubtedly anticipates expanding its online casino in the Grand Canyon status as well. Additionally, that launch might happen within the following month.

The Arizona Department of Gaming opened the application window July 26 and expects to announce which applicants are qualified for licensing by Aug. 15. If all goes to plan, including proper background checks, tech testing and the like, betting apps in Arizona could go online by Aug. 28 to start marketing and allow customers to set up mobile wagering accounts.

If everything goes according to plan, the ADG anticipates that the first authorized wagers will be placed on September 9 - the first day of the 2021 NFL season.

Maxwell Hartgraves, public information officer with the ADG, said that date stands “for sure” as one for mobile betting apps but that retail sportsbooks “could be in place to a certain extent.”

It’s unclear if FanDuel will be able to open its financial gates by then. But, it seems that the technician is well on its approach to establishing brick-and-mortar operations in Arizona.

 

See the latest FanDuel Arizona promo code and promotions.

Before Maricopa County Superior Court Judge James Smith ruled that the Yavapai-Prescott Indian Tribe (YPIT) had failed to establish sufficient grounds for the judge to issue a temporary restraining order against the launch of legalized sports betting in Arizona, there was a new entry on the docket report.

Heading into Labor Day weekend, attorneys for the Tonto Apache Tribe of Arizona and the Quechan Tribe of the Ft. Yuma Indian Reservation (“the Intervenors”) filed a notice of intent to “intervene and opposition to the plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction.”

The plaintiffs protested the treatment but were unable to obtain injunctive relief. The appellate court system in Arizona and Nevada now appears to be the most good next step.

Qualifications of the motion to act

While the process to obtain a temporary restraining order — which failed in the superior court Monday — now enters its next phase, the motion to intervene contained some fascinating insights into how some of the other tribes in Arizona viewed the lawsuit filed by the YPIT.

The Intervenors claimed that they negotiated for the recently amended gaming compact for more than five years along with 18 Arizona & rsquo, or 22 federally recognized tribes. The Grand Canyon State’s legal sports betting will go into effect on September 9 thanks to that arrangement.

Among the 10 nations that obtained sports betting certificates are the Intervenors. & nbsp, the Quechan Tribe of the Ft. Yuma Indian Reservation joined forces with Kindred Group, and TwinSpires teamed up with the Tonto Apache tribe of Arizona.

The Intervenors claimed they had significant stakes in the dispute as licenseed events.

a unique narrative?

The YPIT, according to the Intervenors, tries to remove 20 of Arizona’s 22 tribes’ five years of labor. The Intervenors claim that YPIT was given the chance to take part in the agreements and even encouraged to do so. The Yavapai-Prescott & ldquo, however, decided against doing so. & rdquo,

The Intervenors contend that the YPIT has recourse options. but never as a result of this case.

Instead, the YPIT has the opportunity to go to the table with Gov. Doug Ducey and negotiate. The Intervenors argue, as previousy noted,  that the YPIT remedy lies in federal court under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA) and that the state court efforts are not the proper place for the plaintiff’s complaints to be heard.

Discussion put forth by intervening Arizona nations

The Intervenors declare:

YPIT, & ldquo, comes to this Court with dirty hands seeking incredible comfort despite the fact that it avoided important and good faith small conversations in order to either benefit from the goal or bring a lawsuit against the State. & rdquo,

The Intervenors contend that the court should not even address the claims and should instead decide this case on jurisdictional grounds due to the YPIT & rsquo’s ineffective attempts to obtain a temporary restraining order.

Defendants must erect four points in Arizona

A temporary restraining order or initial injunctive relief in Arizona requires a plaintiff to prove four points.

a high likelihood of success based on virtues,
1. If the requested pleasure is not granted, the plaintiff may suffer catastrophic harm, which cannot be compensated for with problems.
2. Plaintiff benefits from a compromise of difficulties.
3. The lawsuit is supported by public policy.

The claimant, according to the intervenors, fails every step of the way.

the highway or a governmental route

According to the motion, if YPIT wants gaming rights, the tribe & rsquo has a legal right to do so through the IGRA process.

The Intervenors contend that the YPIT won’t be able to get what it wants from the Superior Court( or, more probable, an Arizona appeals court or Arizona Supreme Court by the time this is finished ). Yet if HB 2772 was declared invalid, the process of talks would be restarted from scratch.

Perhaps you actually have a good chance of winning?

The Intervenors evaluate the public plan implications of the YPIT’s success to wrap up their discussion. The Intervenors note in their study that:

It is always in the public interest to stop the violation of a party’s constitutional rights, according to & ldquo, YPIT & rsquo. Since no party’s constitutional rights have been violated, this constitutional generalism has no relevance to the current event. Public policy therefore weighs against YPIT & rsquo’s requested relief( internal citations omitted ). & rdquo,

B in the manifest

Calvin Johnson, the Tonto Apache Tribe’s chair, made a declaration in the motion to act. According to Johnson & Rsquo’s declaration, he started negotiating changes to the tribal-state gaming agreement from 2003 in late 2016.

Johnson claimed that he sent Ernest Jones Sr., the YPIT’s president at the time, an email inviting him to a surrender. There, they would talk about proposals for some of Arizona’s smaller games tribes and strategies for small amendment. Jones declined, but he extended Johnson and Chairwoman Jeri DeCola a mutual offer to meet with the YPIT management in March 2017.

The meeting’s declaration, according to YPIT & rsquo, stated:

& ldquo, that if other tribes were to successfully negotiate a compact amendment with the State and YPIT did not like the terms of the agreement reached by the other tribal parties taking part in the negotiations, the latter would then merely sue the state. & rdquo,

What & rsquo, is scheduled to appear in an Arizona gaming lawsuit?

The appellate judge appears to be the obvious next step for the Yavapai – Prescott, as Judge Smith predicted earlier next week.

The Division One Court of Appeals method did not reflect the tribe’s filing of such an elegance as of the time of writing.

But anticipate it immediately as the sports betting release is set for two days.

Editor’s Note: The following article represents the views of the author.

We may have just witnessed the greatest weekend of NFL football ever.

Four divisional playoff games, all coming down to the final play. With all four ending in walk-off fashion. And it was all capped off with the Kansas City Chiefs beating the Buffalo Bills in a 42-36 overtime thriller.

There are a series of talking points coming out of that game. Is Patrick Mahomes vs. Josh Allen the next generation’s Tom Brady vs. Peyton Manning? What the heck were the Bills trying to do on defense? Was that the best game of all time?

However, the most polarizing topic could lead to a significant change. Should the NFL change its overtime rules and allow both teams to play offense?

This writer thinks the answer is simple: Absolutely not.

Chiefs snatch victory from jaws of defeat in NFL playoffs

First, let’s break down what happened. Early in the fourth quarter, Kansas City kicked a field goal to extend its lead to 26-21. Allen and the Bills responded with a 17-play, seven-minute touchdown drive. The Bills then converted a two-point try to take a 29-26 lead with under two minutes to play. What came next may have been the most exciting two minutes in NFL history.

Mahomes hit Tyreek Hill for a 64-yard touchdown pass to help the Chiefs grab a 33-29 lead with just over a minute to go in the game. Not to be outdone, Josh Allen went right back down the field and found Gabriel Davis for their fourth touchdown connection of the game. The Bills went up 36-33 with only 13 seconds left on the clock.

Mahomes came back with two timeouts and hit Hill and Travis Kelce for two huge gains to get into field-goal range. Then, Chiefs kicker Harrison Butker nailed a 49-yard field goal as time expired to send the game into overtime.

Many think the game was decided once the Chiefs won the coin toss and elected to receive. Mahomes got the ball first and drove his team right down the field. He hit Kelce for an 8-yard touchdown pass to send Kansas City to the AFC championship game. Josh Allen never touched the ball in overtime. Some are upset about that. But I say, too bad. It’s football.

Breaking down NFL playoff overtime rules

The current NFL overtime format was established in 2010. It gives both teams the chance to possess the ball at least once in overtime unless the team that receives the overtime kickoff scores a touchdown on its first possession.

The rules were amended in 2017 when the overtime period was shortened from 15 minutes to 10 minutes in the name of player safety. The complete section of the NFL rule book on overtime, which explains all the procedures in full, can be found here.

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it

After watching what happened to the Bills, there is a new push for the NFL to adopt new rules that will allow both offenses to touch the ball no matter what.

However, in my opinion, changing the overtime rules is unnecessary.

This is not me trying to act like an old grouch. This is based on the opinion of someone who appreciates all phases of the game. Not just offense. Saying Josh Allen deserved a chance to respond is essentially saying we should change a rule for one guy.

Are we saying that the Bills didn’t have a chance to win because they didn’t win the overtime coin toss? If so, then the overtime rules should be the least of our problems. During the 2021 NFL regular season, there were 21 overtime games. Only four of those ended with the first-possession touchdown. That is 1.4% of the 272 games played this year.

Also, there wasn’t a huge cry to change the rules the quarterbacks left on the sidelines in those games. Maybe if Jameis Winston, Carson Wentz, Sam Darnold and Justin Herbert had more fans, there would have been a louder outcry when they were left on the sidelines.

Football is a “team” game

The last time I checked, the players on the Bills defense also get paid. They had every opportunity to make sure that their teammates on offense had a chance to score. Not only did they let the Chiefs get in field goal range to send the game into overtime with 13 seconds left, but they also couldn’t stop them from going right down the field to score the game-winning touchdown.

Let’s say the NFL changed the rule to allow both teams to touch the ball. In that scenario, fans are just waiting to see which defense will come up with a stop anyway.

Furthermore, changing the rules is basically saying that the Bills defense should be let off the hook for not stopping Mahomes and the Kansas City offense. In other words, Josh Allen should make up for the fact that his defense didn’t do its job.

Bills had chance to push rule change but didn’t

While the Chiefs-Bills 2022 playoff game may live in infamy, the irony of how the game ended is uncanny.

This is not the first time the current NFL overtime rules have been in question. In fact, the last time this issue made news, Patrick Mahomes was on the other side of it.

In the AFC championship game during the 2018 NFL season, it was Mahomes left sitting on the sidelines as Tom Brady led the New England Patriots on a game-winning touchdown drive in the first possession of overtime to send the Patriots to the Super Bowl.

The Chiefs, understandably frustrated, submitted a rule change proposal to the NFL Competition Committee the following spring. Included in the proposal was to allow both teams the opportunity to possess the ball at least one time in overtime, even if the first team to possess the ball in overtime scores a touchdown.

The Chiefs’ proposal was tabled twice in 2019 and eventually dropped. What’s ironic is that the Bills were one of the teams that didn’t want the rules to change. Those same rules have turned around to work Kansas City’s favor in 2022.

Said Chiefs head coach Andy Reid: “I’m glad we didn’t make a change.”

Is Josh Allen this generation’s Brett Favre?

We got to where we are today because of Brett Favre. Many remember the legendary Packers quarterback because of his time in Green Bay. However, many may have forgotten that Favre not getting the ball in a crucial overtime game during his time with the Minnesota Vikings helped change the rules to what they are today.

In the NFC championship game of the 2009 season, the New Orleans Saints beat Favre and the Vikings 31-28 in overtime. It was a wild game full of memorable moments. But it was Drew Brees who got the ball first in overtime and led the Saints down the field to kick the game-winning field goal.

At that time, a first-drive field goal would win the game. But Brett Favre not being able to participate in Super Bowl XLIV caused the NFL to alter its overtime rules then. Will they do the same for Josh Allen?

The list of QBs the NFL didn’t change the rules for

Realistically, the league won’t go into the rulebook with a red pen because such a great playoff game ended the way it did. Who knows, though?

But let’s take a look at other noteworthy quarterbacks who were on the wrong end of these overtime rules.

1. Ben Roethlisberger – 2012: Broncos vs. Steelers

Who won the coin toss? Broncos

Result: Broncos win AFC wild-card game, 29-23

It didn’t take long for the Broncos to end the game. Tim Tebow hit the late Demaryius Thomas on the first play of overtime for an 80-yard touchdown. Big Ben Roethlisberger, who was already a two-time Super Bowl champion, did not touch the ball in the extra period.

It was the NFL’s first playoff game under the new OT rules, but the result would have been the same under the old sudden death rules.

2. Aaron Rodgers – 2015: Seahawks vs. Packers

Who won the coin toss? Seahawks

Result: Seahawks win NFC championship game, 28-22

This game is remembered for the Packers’ botched attempt to secure an onside kick. After a wild final two minutes, it was all tied up at 22. But Green Bay’s defense couldn’t stop Seattle’s offense in overtime. Russell Wilson hit Jermaine Kearse on a 35-yard touchdown pass to send the Seahawks to the Super Bowl.

Aaron Rodgers never set foot on the field in the overtime. This was the second time an NFL playoff game ended on the first possession under the new OT rules.

3. Aaron Rodgers – 2016: Cardinals vs. Packers

Who won the coin toss? Cardinals

Result: Cardinals win NFC divisional game, 26-20

For the second season in a row, Rodgers and the Packers were knocked out of the playoffs following the first possession of overtime. Let’s not forget, Rodgers hit Jeff Janis on a miraculous 41-yard Hail Mary to send the game into OT. But after a 75-yard catch and run by Larry Fitzgerald, Carson Palmer found “Fitz” again on a quick pitch that resulted in a TD pass. A fond memory for Arizona Cardinals fans.

4. Matt Ryan – 2017: Patriots vs. Falcons

Who won the coin toss? Patriots

Result: Patriots win Super Bowl 51, 34-28

We all know Atlanta let go of a 28-3 lead. But the Falcons still had a chance to win the Super Bowl in overtime. It took Tom Brady and the Patriots nine plays and about four minutes to score the game-winning TD. Matt Ryan, the league’s MVP that season, didn’t touch the ball in overtime. But no rule change was made after the NFL’s biggest game.

5. Patrick Mahomes – 2019: Chiefs vs. Patriots

Who won the coin toss? Patriots

Result: Patriots win AFC championship game, 37-31

As we already discussed, Tom Brady once again left the opposing quarterback on the sidelines in overtime. The Patriots won the coin toss and scored a touchdown on the first overtime possession, not giving Mahomes and the Chiefs the opportunity on offense.